From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hernandez v. Ricci

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 7, 2005
15 A.D.3d 351 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

2004-00093.

February 7, 2005.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Minardo, J.), dated October 23, 2003, as denied his cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Before: Crane, J.P., Rivera, Skelos and Lifson, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, the cross motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.

The defendant established his prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by demonstrating that the accident was caused as a result of an onset of a sudden, unforeseeable medical emergency ( see State of New York v. Susco, 245 AD2d 854; Abish v. Cetta, 155 AD2d 495; Thomas v. Hulslander, 233 AD2d 567). In opposition, the plaintiff failed to submit evidence sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact.


Summaries of

Hernandez v. Ricci

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 7, 2005
15 A.D.3d 351 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

Hernandez v. Ricci

Case Details

Full title:MARY HERNANDEZ, Respondent, v. GARY S. RICCI, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 7, 2005

Citations

15 A.D.3d 351 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
788 N.Y.S.2d 867

Citing Cases

Van De Merlen v. Karpf

"The operator of a vehicle who becomes involved in an accident as the result of suffering a sudden medical…

Mowton v. Rabiner

The plaintiffs commenced this action to recover damages, inter alia, for personal injuries allegedly…