From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hernandez v. McDonald

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 22, 2013
No. 2:12-cv-2254 AC P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 22, 2013)

Opinion

No. 2:12-cv-2254 AC P

04-22-2013

BENNY HERNANDEZ, Plaintiff, v. MIKE McDONALD, Defendant.


ORDER

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis who seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has consented to the jurisdiction of the undersigned. ECF No. 5.

By order filed February 12, 2013, this court ordered plaintiff to complete and return to the court, within twenty-eight days, the USM-285 forms necessary to effect service on defendant. ECF No. 11. A review of the docket reflects that the order was served on plaintiff on February 12, 2013, and, to date, has not been returned.

More than twenty-eight days have passed since the court entered is February 12, 2013 order, and plaintiff has not complied or otherwise responded in any way.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

____________________

ALLISON CLAIRE

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Hernandez v. McDonald

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 22, 2013
No. 2:12-cv-2254 AC P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 22, 2013)
Case details for

Hernandez v. McDonald

Case Details

Full title:BENNY HERNANDEZ, Plaintiff, v. MIKE McDONALD, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Apr 22, 2013

Citations

No. 2:12-cv-2254 AC P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 22, 2013)