From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hernandez v. Gateway Demolition Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 12, 1999
263 A.D.2d 467 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

Submitted May 28, 1999

July 12, 1999

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for underpayment of prevailing wages, the plaintiffs appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lonschein, J.), dated April 6, 1998, as granted that branch of the defendants' motion which was to dismiss the class action allegations of the complaint, and denied their cross motion to certify the action as a class action.

Hollander Associates, P.C., New York, N.Y. (Larry B. Hollander and Jeffrey D. Greenberg of counsel), and Cary Scott Goldinger, Garden City, N.Y., for appellants (one brief filed).

Easton Echtman, P.C., New York, N.Y., for respondents.

FRED T. SANTUCCI, J.P., GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN, ANITA R. FLORIO, SANDRA J. FEUERSTEIN, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in granting that branch of the defendants' motion which was to dismiss the class action allegations of the complaint and denying the plaintiffs' cross motion to certify the action as a class action since the plaintiffs moved one year and three months after the time within which to move to certify a class had expired ( see, CPLR 902; see generally, O'Hara v. Del Bello, 47 N.Y.2d 363).


Summaries of

Hernandez v. Gateway Demolition Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 12, 1999
263 A.D.2d 467 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Hernandez v. Gateway Demolition Corp.

Case Details

Full title:SABINO HERNANDEZ, et al., appellants, v. GATEWAY DEMOLITION CORP., et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 12, 1999

Citations

263 A.D.2d 467 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
691 N.Y.S.2d 915

Citing Cases

Singh v. The City of New York

The court in a class action has broad powers to control the course of the litigation * * (City of Rochester v…

Louisiana Mun. v. Cablevision Sys

However, the time limit contained in CPLR 902 applies to the initial certification of class actions, not…