From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hernandez v. Quinn

SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jun 27, 2018
J-A10038-18 (Pa. Super. Ct. Jun. 27, 2018)

Opinion

J-A10038-18 No. 2017 EDA 2017

06-27-2018

LEO HERNANDEZ Appellant v. BRIAN E. QUINN, ESQUIRE, THE LAW OFFICES OF BRIAN E. QUINN, AND BRIAN E. QUINN ESQUIRE, PC


NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37

Appeal from the Order Entered May 17, 2017
In the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County Civil Division at No(s): 161001514 BEFORE: GANTMAN, P.J., McLAUGHLIN, J., and RANSOM, J. CONCURRING/DISSENTING STATEMENT BY McLAUGHLIN, J.:

Retired Senior Judge assigned to the Superior Court. --------

I join the Majority decision insofar as it affirms the order sustaining Appellees' Preliminary Objections. I must respectfully dissent, however, to the extent the Majority reverses. I would hold that the trial court properly sustained the preliminary objections to the claims for invasion of privacy and for intentional infliction of emotional distress.


Summaries of

Hernandez v. Quinn

SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jun 27, 2018
J-A10038-18 (Pa. Super. Ct. Jun. 27, 2018)
Case details for

Hernandez v. Quinn

Case Details

Full title:LEO HERNANDEZ Appellant v. BRIAN E. QUINN, ESQUIRE, THE LAW OFFICES OF…

Court:SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Jun 27, 2018

Citations

J-A10038-18 (Pa. Super. Ct. Jun. 27, 2018)