From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hernandez v. Biddix

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Aug 2, 2012
No. 3:12-0606 (M.D. Tenn. Aug. 2, 2012)

Opinion

No. 3:12-0606

08-02-2012

GEORGE ISAAC HERNANDEZ, JR., Plaintiff v. SGT. MELANIE BIDDIX, et al., Defendants


Judge Sharp/Brown

Jury Demand


ORDER

This matter has been assigned to the undersigned for case management and for a report and recommendation for any dispositive motions. Docket Entry 2 should be TERMINATED as the Court has now allowed Plaintiff to proceed in forma pauperis (Docket Entry 14).

The Plaintiff has filed a motion for a temporary restraining order/emergency injunction (Docket Entry 6). The complaint in this motion indicates that the Plaintiff is presently housed in the Western District of Tennessee. The Magistrate Judge has initial concern as to whether the court in the Middle District of Tennessee has jurisdiction. It may well be that jurisdiction for assault in the West Tennessee prison should be appropriately brought by the Plaintiff in the Western District of Tennessee. The Magistrate Judge will issue a separate report and recommendation on Docket Entry 6.

The Magistrate Judge notes that the district court has dismissed the complaint against all Defendants except Melanie Biddix. The Clerk should therefore terminate the remaining Defendants in this case.

Once service of process has issued and the Defendant has responded the Magistrate Judge will set this case for a Rule 16 hearing.

At the present time Sgt. Biddix is the only Defendant in this case and is sued in her individual capacity. As pointed out above, the Magistrate Judge serious doubt that this court has jurisdiction over the Plaintiff's complaint about treatment and safety in the West Tennessee prison. However, given the nature of the allegation, the Clerk is directed to send a copy of Docket Entries 6 and 7 to the Warden at the West Tennessee State Prison in Henning, and to the Attorney General and the Commissioner of Corrections as a matter of information only.

The Plaintiff is reminded that the under the prison litigation format, before bringing complaints about a treatment at the prison, he must exhaust his administrative grievance procedures.

It is so ORDERED.

______________________

JOE B. BROWN

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Hernandez v. Biddix

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Aug 2, 2012
No. 3:12-0606 (M.D. Tenn. Aug. 2, 2012)
Case details for

Hernandez v. Biddix

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE ISAAC HERNANDEZ, JR., Plaintiff v. SGT. MELANIE BIDDIX, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

Date published: Aug 2, 2012

Citations

No. 3:12-0606 (M.D. Tenn. Aug. 2, 2012)