From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hernandez v. Bernstein

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Jun 11, 2018
Civ. No. 3:17-cv-01654-JR (D. Or. Jun. 11, 2018)

Opinion

Civ. No. 3:17-cv-01654-JR

06-11-2018

ARACELY HERNANDEZ, Plaintiff, v. S. BERNSTEIN, et al., Defendants.


ORDER :

Magistrate Judge Jolie A. Russo filed a Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 13), and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72. Defendants filed objections to the Findings and Recommendation. Accordingly, I have reviewed the file of this case de novo. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(c); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981). I find no error and conclude the report is correct. Magistrate Judge Russo's Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 13) is adopted. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 9) is denied. IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 11th day of June, 2018.

/s/ Michael J. McShane

Michael McShane

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Hernandez v. Bernstein

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Jun 11, 2018
Civ. No. 3:17-cv-01654-JR (D. Or. Jun. 11, 2018)
Case details for

Hernandez v. Bernstein

Case Details

Full title:ARACELY HERNANDEZ, Plaintiff, v. S. BERNSTEIN, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: Jun 11, 2018

Citations

Civ. No. 3:17-cv-01654-JR (D. Or. Jun. 11, 2018)