From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hernandez v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FRESNO
Feb 21, 2013
CIVIL NO. 1:12-cv-1270-GSA (E.D. Cal. Feb. 21, 2013)

Opinion

CIVIL NO. 1:12-cv-1270-GSA

02-21-2013

SARAH A. HERNANDEZ, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney GRACE M. KIM Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration PATRICK WILLIAM SNYDER, CSBN 260690 Special Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for Defendant BRIAN C. SHAPIRO Attorney at Law Attorney for Plaintiff DONNA L. CALVERT Acting Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration


BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
GRACE M. KIM
Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX
Social Security Administration
PATRICK WILLIAM SNYDER, CSBN 260690
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Attorneys for Defendant

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

The parties hereby stipulate by counsel, with the Court's approval as indicated by issuance of the attached Order, that Defendant shall have an extension of time of 45 days to respond to Plaintiff's Settlement Letter up to and including April 5, 2013. The response is currently due February 19, 2013. This extension is being sought to correct a potential defect in the administrative transcript. This is the Commissioner's first extension request.

The parties further stipulate that the Court's Scheduling Order shall be modified accordingly.

Respectfully submitted,

_______________

BRIAN C. SHAPIRO

(as authorized via Brian C. Shapiro via email on 2/19/13)

Attorney at Law

Attorney for Plaintiff

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

DONNA L. CALVERT

Acting Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX

Social Security Administration

By: _______________

PATRICK WILLIAM SNYDER

Special Assistant U.S. Attorney

Attorneys for Defendant

ORDER

Pursuant to the above stipulation, Defendant's request for an extension of time to respond to Plaintiff's confidential letter brief until April 5, 2013 is granted. Pursuant to this Court's scheduling order issued on August 7, 2012 (Doc. 6-1), Plaintiff's opening brief shall be due thirty (30) days after the service of Defendant's response. In the event that the parties stipulate to a remand to the Commissioner, the stipulation shall be filed with the Court within fifteen (15) days after the service of Defendant's response to the confidential letter brief. The scheduling order is modified accordingly. All other orders contained in this Court's scheduling order issued on August 7, 2012, in full force and effect. (Doc. 6-1).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Gary S. Austin

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Hernandez v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FRESNO
Feb 21, 2013
CIVIL NO. 1:12-cv-1270-GSA (E.D. Cal. Feb. 21, 2013)
Case details for

Hernandez v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:SARAH A. HERNANDEZ, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FRESNO

Date published: Feb 21, 2013

Citations

CIVIL NO. 1:12-cv-1270-GSA (E.D. Cal. Feb. 21, 2013)