From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hernandez v. Ascencio

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California, Eastern Division
Mar 16, 2010
5:08CV1776 ERW (C.D. Cal. Mar. 16, 2010)

Opinion


DAMIAN VERGARA HERNANDEZ, Plaintiff, v. ARTURO ASCENCIO, ET AL. Defendants. No. 5:08CV1776 ERW. United States District Court, C.D. California, Eastern Division. March 16, 2010.

          MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

          E. RICHARD WEBBER, District Judge.

         On February 4, 2010, after a status conference with the Parties, this Court scheduled another status conference, to take place via telephone on March 15, 2010, at 1:30 p.m. Central Time. The purpose of this March 15, 2010 status conference was to determine if any progress had been made on the issue of whether the United States Attorney's Office had accepted representation as to Defendants Arturo Ascencio and William Brett.

         On March 15, 2010, the telephone status conference took place, however, very little was accomplished because the Court was unable to locate Assistant United States Attorney Jason K. Axe. The Court attempted to reach Mr. Axe numerous times, but was unsuccessful each time.

         The Court must now reschedule the telephone status conference that was supposed to take place on March 15, 2010, with the expectation that all counsel will be available to participate. The telephone status conference is now scheduled for Friday, March 26, 2010, at 1:00 p.m. Central Time (11:00 a.m. Pacific Time). The Court has contacted the attorneys in this case to ensure their participation. The Court will initiate the conference.

         Accordingly,

         IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that a status conference regarding representation will be held on Friday, March 26, 2010, at 1:00 p.m. Central Time (11:00 a.m. Pacific Time).

         IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants shall Answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint no later than Monday, April 5, 2010.


Summaries of

Hernandez v. Ascencio

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California, Eastern Division
Mar 16, 2010
5:08CV1776 ERW (C.D. Cal. Mar. 16, 2010)
Case details for

Hernandez v. Ascencio

Case Details

Full title:DAMIAN VERGARA HERNANDEZ, Plaintiff, v. ARTURO ASCENCIO, ET AL. Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California, Eastern Division

Date published: Mar 16, 2010

Citations

5:08CV1776 ERW (C.D. Cal. Mar. 16, 2010)