From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hernandez-Inigo v. Berryhill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Sep 18, 2017
No. CV 16-518-TUC-JAS (LCK) (D. Ariz. Sep. 18, 2017)

Opinion

No. CV 16-518-TUC-JAS (LCK)

09-18-2017

Ana G. Hernandez-Inigo, Plaintiff, v. Nancy A. Berryhill, Defendant.


ORDER

Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation issued by United States Magistrate Judge Kimmins. A review of the record reflects that the parties have not filed any objections to the Report and Recommendation and the time to file objections has expired. As such, the Court will not consider any objections or new evidence.

The Court has reviewed the record and concludes that Magistrate Judge Kimmins' recommendations are not clearly erroneous. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72; Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999); Conley v. Crabtree, 14 F. Supp. 2d 1203, 1204 (D. Or. 1998).

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: (1) Magistrate Judge Kimmins' Report and Recommendation (Doc. 20) is accepted and adopted, and this case is remanded for an award of benefits. (2) The Clerk of the Court shall close the file in this case.

DATED this 18th day of September, 2017.

/s/_________

James A. Soto

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Hernandez-Inigo v. Berryhill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Sep 18, 2017
No. CV 16-518-TUC-JAS (LCK) (D. Ariz. Sep. 18, 2017)
Case details for

Hernandez-Inigo v. Berryhill

Case Details

Full title:Ana G. Hernandez-Inigo, Plaintiff, v. Nancy A. Berryhill, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Date published: Sep 18, 2017

Citations

No. CV 16-518-TUC-JAS (LCK) (D. Ariz. Sep. 18, 2017)