From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hermesmeyer v. N.W. Invest. Co.

Supreme Court of Michigan
Jun 1, 1931
236 N.W. 810 (Mich. 1931)

Opinion

Docket No. 130, Calendar No. 35,647.

Submitted April 17, 1931.

Decided June 1, 1931.

Appeal from Wayne; Webster (Clyde I.), J. Submitted April 17, 1931. (Docket No. 130, Calendar No. 35,647.) Decided June 1, 1931.

Bill by Matthew H. Hermesmeyer and another against Northwestern Investment Company, a Michigan corporation, and others to rescind a land contract. Upon transfer to the law side of the court, defendants filed counterclaim for payments due. From order denying defendants' motion for summary judgment on counterclaim, they appeal. Appeal dismissed.

James M. Cleary, for plaintiffs.

J. Gilbert Quail and Arthur Gloster, for defendants.


The defendant Northwestern Investment Company here seeks review by appeal from an order of the trial court denying its motion for summary judgment on its claim made by way of counterclaim and recoupment in a notice attached to the plea of the general issue. No application for leave to appeal was made to this court, and no such leave has been granted. The appeal must therefore be dismissed. As this question is not raised by counsel for appellees, no costs will be allowed.

We may say, however, after an examination of the record, that, were decision to rest on the merits of the appeal, the same result would be reached.

BUTZEL, C.J., and WIEST, CLARK, McDONALD, POTTER, NORTH, and FEAD, JJ., concurred.


Summaries of

Hermesmeyer v. N.W. Invest. Co.

Supreme Court of Michigan
Jun 1, 1931
236 N.W. 810 (Mich. 1931)
Case details for

Hermesmeyer v. N.W. Invest. Co.

Case Details

Full title:HERMESMEYER v. NORTHWESTERN INVESTMENT CO

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan

Date published: Jun 1, 1931

Citations

236 N.W. 810 (Mich. 1931)
236 N.W. 810

Citing Cases

Shank v. Lippman

Clearly the motion is well founded. See Hermesmeyer v. Northwestern Investment Co., 254 Mich. 384. In the…

American Alloys Sales Co. v. Grier

Thus, under the old practice as well as the new, denial prior to trial of an interlocutory motion has never…