From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Herman v. Goldschmidt

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Feb 14, 1957
8 Misc. 2d 749 (N.Y. App. Term 1957)

Opinion

February 14, 1957

Appeal from the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Manhattan, CHARLES MARKS, J.

Albert J. Dib and Stephen A. Wise for appellant.

Nathan Shapiro for respondent.


No appeal can be taken from the order or from the judgment entered upon the default. The prior order of this court (entered July 2, 1956) so held, the defendant being advised, if he saw fit, to make application for relief pursuant to subdivision 5 of section 154 of the Municipal Court Code.

The appeal should be dismissed, with $10 costs.

HECHT, AURELIO and TILZER, JJ., concur.

Appeal dismissed, etc.


Summaries of

Herman v. Goldschmidt

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Feb 14, 1957
8 Misc. 2d 749 (N.Y. App. Term 1957)
Case details for

Herman v. Goldschmidt

Case Details

Full title:S. EUGENE HERMAN, Respondent, v. A. ERWIN GOLDSCHMIDT, Appellant

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Feb 14, 1957

Citations

8 Misc. 2d 749 (N.Y. App. Term 1957)
170 N.Y.S.2d 719