From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Herd Chiropractic Clinic, P.C. v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
Apr 30, 2012
No. 625 MAL 2011 (Pa. Apr. 30, 2012)

Opinion

No. 625 MAL 2011

04-30-2012

HERD CHIROPRACTIC CLINIC, P.C., Respondent v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner


Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court


ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 30th day of April, 2012, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:

Whether the Superior Court improperly interpreted §1797 of the MVFRL and its own case of Barnum v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 635 A.2d 155 (Pa.Super. 1993) rev'd in part by Terminato v. Pennsylvania National Ins. Co., 645 A.2d 1287 (Pa. 1994), to allow attorney's fees even when an insurer has utilized the Peer Review process?


Summaries of

Herd Chiropractic Clinic, P.C. v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
Apr 30, 2012
No. 625 MAL 2011 (Pa. Apr. 30, 2012)
Case details for

Herd Chiropractic Clinic, P.C. v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:HERD CHIROPRACTIC CLINIC, P.C., Respondent v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT

Date published: Apr 30, 2012

Citations

No. 625 MAL 2011 (Pa. Apr. 30, 2012)