From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Herbert v. Morgan Drive-A-Way, Inc.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 30, 1995
85 N.Y.2d 895 (N.Y. 1995)

Opinion

Decided March 30, 1995

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department, Joseph P. Torraca, J.

Cynthia Feathers, Saratoga, and Eli B. Basch, Kingston, for appellants.

Respondents precluded.



On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 N.Y.CRR 500.4), order, insofar as appealed from, reversed, with costs, motion by defendants Morgan Drive-A-Way, Inc. and Errol K. Miller for summary judgment dismissing the complaint of plaintiffs Batoul Herbert and Donald Herbert as against them in action No. 1 denied and certified question answered in the affirmative for the reasons stated in the dissenting memorandum of Justice Paul J. Yesawich, Jr., at the Appellate Division ( 202 A.D.2d 886, 888-889).

Concur: Chief Judge KAYE and Judges SIMONS, TITONE, BELLACOSA, SMITH, LEVINE and CIPARICK.


Summaries of

Herbert v. Morgan Drive-A-Way, Inc.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 30, 1995
85 N.Y.2d 895 (N.Y. 1995)
Case details for

Herbert v. Morgan Drive-A-Way, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:BATOUL HERBERT et al., Appellants, v. MORGAN DRIVE-A-WAY, INC., et al.…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Mar 30, 1995

Citations

85 N.Y.2d 895 (N.Y. 1995)
627 N.Y.S.2d 315
650 N.E.2d 1316

Citing Cases

Nieves v. Hunter EMS, Inc.

The emergency doctrine, however, is not available where the circumstances are of the defendant's making (see…

Lester v. Chmaj

Thus, Buerkley, Hagan and Goodfellow are also entitled to summary judgment dismissing the complaint. We…