From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Herbert v. District of Columbia

District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Jul 31, 1997
698 A.2d 1017 (D.C. 1997)

Opinion

No. 93-CV-407.

July 31, 1997.

Before WAGNER,* Chief Judge; FERREN, TERRY,* STEADMAN, SCHWELB,* FARRELL, KING, RUIZ, and REID, Associate Judges.

Associate Judge Ferren has recused himself from consideration of the petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc.

Associate Judge Ruiz has recused herself from this case.


ORDER


On consideration of the petition of appellee, District of Columbia, for rehearing or rehearing en banc, and appellant's response thereto, it is

ORDERED by the merits division * that the petition for rehearing is denied; and it appearing that the majority of the judges of this court has voted to grant the petition for rehearing en banc, it is

FURTHER ORDERED that appellee's petition for rehearing en banc is granted and that the opinion and judgment of April 10, 1997, are hereby vacated. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall schedule this matter for argument before the court sitting en banc as soon as the calendar permits. Counsel are hereby directed to provide ten copies of the briefs heretofore filed to the Clerk on or before August 8, 1997.


Summaries of

Herbert v. District of Columbia

District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Jul 31, 1997
698 A.2d 1017 (D.C. 1997)
Case details for

Herbert v. District of Columbia

Case Details

Full title:Katherine HERBERT, Appellant, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al., Appellees

Court:District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Date published: Jul 31, 1997

Citations

698 A.2d 1017 (D.C. 1997)

Citing Cases

Portillo v. United States

See D.C. Code § 24-211.02. See Herbert v. District of Columbia, 691 A.2d 1175 (D.C. 1997), reh'g en banc…

Herbert v. District of Columbia

Specifically, the court held that the District's duty to provide reasonable, non-negligent medical care for…