From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Henzel v. Costich

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 20, 1938
253 App. Div. 863 (N.Y. App. Div. 1938)

Opinion

January 20, 1938.

Appeal from Albany Trial Term.

Present — Hill, P.J., McNamee, Crapser, Bliss and Heffernan, JJ.


The complaint alleged a cause of action for services in caring for the house rented by defendant Oliver U. Costich, and where he and other employees of the corporate defendant lived while conducting construction work in the Albany area, and in cooking meals for them. Plaintiff claimed a contract was made with her, Henzel, for these services, at an agreed price and reasonable value. Costich was the manager of the corporate defendant, and died before the action was brought. The evidence was sufficient to support plaintiff's contention as to the making of the contract, and the rendition of the services, and to establish their value. The trial judge received evidence of conversations between plaintiff and Costich, as against the corporation, but not as binding on the deceased. The evidence of other witnesses, and that of plaintiff brought out on cross-examination by the attorney for defendants was ample to justify the jury in rendering its verdict against both defendants. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs.


Summaries of

Henzel v. Costich

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 20, 1938
253 App. Div. 863 (N.Y. App. Div. 1938)
Case details for

Henzel v. Costich

Case Details

Full title:MARGARET HENZEL, Respondent, v. IRENE L. COSTICH, ARTHUR L. MARTIN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jan 20, 1938

Citations

253 App. Div. 863 (N.Y. App. Div. 1938)