From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hensley v. City of Upland

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jan 24, 2022
5:20-cv-02462-CBM-ASx (C.D. Cal. Jan. 24, 2022)

Opinion

5:20-cv-02462-CBM-ASx

01-24-2022

RAY ANTHONY HENSLEY, Plaintiff, v. THE CITY OF UPLAND, CALIFORNIA OFFICER ALEXANDER MONROY; OFFICER ANDREW NAKAMURA; AND DOES 1-10. Defendants.


Honorable Alka Sagar Magistrate Judge

ORDER RE JOINT STIPULATION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE [JS-6]

HONORABLE CONSUELO B. MARSHALL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

HAVING CONSIDERED THE PARTIES JOINT STIPULATION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. Defendant THE CITY OF UPLAND, CALIFORNIA is dismissed with prejudice from the entire case and all claims stated therein;

2. Defendant OFFICER ALEXANDER MONROY is dismissed with prejudice from the entire case and all claims stated therein;

3. Defendant OFFICER ANDREW NAKAMURA is dismissed with prejudice from the entire case and all claims stated therein;

4. The First Cause of Action, Unreasonable Search and Seizure - Excessive Force, stated in the Complaint is dismissed with prejudice as to all defendants;

5. The Second Cause of Action, Municipal Liability - Unconstitutional Custom or Practice, stated in the Complaint is dismissed with prejudice as to all defendants;

6. All parties agree to bear then own fees and costs incurred hi the above referenced case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Hensley v. City of Upland

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jan 24, 2022
5:20-cv-02462-CBM-ASx (C.D. Cal. Jan. 24, 2022)
Case details for

Hensley v. City of Upland

Case Details

Full title:RAY ANTHONY HENSLEY, Plaintiff, v. THE CITY OF UPLAND, CALIFORNIA OFFICER…

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Jan 24, 2022

Citations

5:20-cv-02462-CBM-ASx (C.D. Cal. Jan. 24, 2022)