From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Henry v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION
Aug 27, 2012
CASE NO. 5:05-CR-59 (MTT) (M.D. Ga. Aug. 27, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NO. 5:05-CR-59 (MTT)

08-27-2012

DON GORDON HENRY, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.


ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Charles H. Weigle (Doc. 177) on Petitioner Don Gordon Henry's successive Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Doc. 174). The Petitioner has not objected to the Recommendation. The Magistrate Judge recommends dismissing the Motion because this is the Petitioner's second or successive motion. Before the district court can consider a successive or second motion, a petitioner must first "move in the appropriate court of appeals for an order authorizing the district court to consider the application." 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(A); see 28 U.S.C. § 2255(h) (cross-referencing § 2244 certification requirement).

Here, the Petitioner filed the present Motion without prior Eleventh Circuit approval, and thus the district court is without jurisdiction to consider the Motion. The Court has reviewed the Petitioner's Motion and the Recommendation. The Recommendation is adopted, and the Petitioner's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence is DENIED. (Doc. 174).

________________________

MARC T. TREADWELL, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

Henry v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION
Aug 27, 2012
CASE NO. 5:05-CR-59 (MTT) (M.D. Ga. Aug. 27, 2012)
Case details for

Henry v. United States

Case Details

Full title:DON GORDON HENRY, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION

Date published: Aug 27, 2012

Citations

CASE NO. 5:05-CR-59 (MTT) (M.D. Ga. Aug. 27, 2012)