From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Henry v. State

Court of Appeals of Arkansas Division I
Mar 15, 1995
894 S.W.2d 610 (Ark. Ct. App. 1995)

Opinion

CA CR 94-498

Opinion delivered March 15, 1995

1. APPEAL ERROR — TIMING FOR FILING A NOTICE OF APPEAL AFTER DISPOSITION OF A POST-TRIAL MOTION — TIMELY FILING OF NOTICE OF APPEAL JURISDICTIONAL. — A notice of appeal filed prior to the disposition of a post-trial motion has no effect, and a new notice of appeal must be filed within the prescribed time dated from the entry of the order dealing with the post-trial motion or from the expiration of the thirty days allowed in the absence of a ruling; the timely filing of a notice of appeal is jurisdictional. 2. APPEAL ERROR — NOTICE OF APPEAL NOT TIMELY FILED — APPELLATE COURT WITHOUT JURISDICTION. — Where the appellant failed to file a notice of appeal in a timely manner following his filing of a post-trial motion, the appellate court lacked jurisdiction to entertain the matter and the appeal was dismissed.

Appeal from Pulaski Circuit Court; Morris W. Thompson, Judge; dismissed.

Hubert W. Alexander, for appellant.

Winston Bryant, Att'y Gen., by: Brad Newman, Asst. Att'y Gen., for appellee.


The appellant was convicted in a bench trial on January 7, 1994, of driving while intoxicated. Judgment was entered on January 26, 1994. The appellant filed his notice of appeal on February 7, 1994. The appellant also filed a Motion to Reconsider Motion to Dismiss and Trial Verdict on February 7, 1994. No subsequent notice of appeal was filed. We do not address the argument raised by the appellant on appeal because we conclude that he failed to file a timely notice of appeal.

Arkansas Rule of Criminal Procedure 36.9 provides for the time and method for taking appeals in criminal cases as follows:

(a) Within thirty (30) days from

(1) the date of entry of a judgment; or

(2) the date of entry of an order denying a post-trial motion under Rule 36.22; or

(3) the date a post-trial motion under Rule 36.22 is deemed denied pursuant to Rule 4(c) of the Rules of Appellate Procedure;

(4) the date of entry of an order denying a petition for postconviction relief under Rule 37, the person desiring to appeal the judgment or order shall file with the trial court a notice of appeal identifying the parties taking the appeal and the judgment or order appealed.

(b) A notice of appeal is invalid if it is filed prior to the entry of the judgment or order appealed from or if it is filed on or before the date a post-trial motion under Rule 36.22 is deemed denied pursuant to Rule 4(c) of the Rules of Appellate Procedure.

Arkansas Rule of Criminal Procedure 36.22 provides that a person convicted of either a felony or misdemeanor may file a motion for a new trial, a motion in arrest of judgment, or any other application for relief, but all motions or applications must be filed prior to the time fixed to file a notice of appeal.

[1, 2] A notice of appeal filed prior to the disposition of a post-trial motion has no effect, and a new notice of appeal must be filed within the prescribed time dated from the entry of the order dealing with the post-trial motion or from the expiration of the thirty days allowed in the absence of a ruling. Lawrence Bros. v. R.J. Jones Excavating Contractor, 318 Ark. 328, 884 S.W.2d 620 (1994). The timely filing of a notice of appeal is jurisdictional. Giacona v. State, 39 Ark. App. 101, 839 S.W.2d 228 (1992). We find that the appellant failed to file a timely notice of appeal and as a result, this Court lacks jurisdiction to entertain the matter. We, therefore, dismiss the appeal.

Appeal dismissed.

PITTMAN and ROGERS, JJ., agree.


Summaries of

Henry v. State

Court of Appeals of Arkansas Division I
Mar 15, 1995
894 S.W.2d 610 (Ark. Ct. App. 1995)
Case details for

Henry v. State

Case Details

Full title:Johnny E. HENRY v. STATE of Arkansas

Court:Court of Appeals of Arkansas Division I

Date published: Mar 15, 1995

Citations

894 S.W.2d 610 (Ark. Ct. App. 1995)
894 S.W.2d 610

Citing Cases

Cannon v. State

This line of reasoning ignores the fact that the timely filing of a notice of appeal is a jurisdictional…

Arkansas Department of Human Services v. Dix

First, DHS's notice of appeal is ineffective to bring the adjudication order up for review. the filing of a…