From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Henry v. Aramark Corp.

United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Southern Division
Jan 2, 2008
CIVIL ACTION NO. 05-0490-CG-C (S.D. Ala. Jan. 2, 2008)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 05-0490-CG-C.

January 2, 2008


ORDER


This matter is before the court on plaintiff's motion to proceed with trial preparation and lift the stay. (Doc. 92). Summary judgment was previously granted in favor of defendant. (Doc. 67). This court found that plaintiff's age discrimination claim failed because plaintiff had failed to satisfy the administrative prerequisites to suit. (Doc. 67). Plaintiff's motion to alter or amend judgment was also denied by this court. (Doc. 72). Prior to the summary judgment ruling, all of plaintiff's other claims were dismissed from the case. Additionally, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed plaintiff's appeal as frivolous. (Doc. 91). This case is closed. There is no trial to prepare for and no stay has been entered. Therefore, plaintiff's motion to proceed with trial preparation and lift the stay (Doc. 92) is DENIED as MOOT.

The court dismissed Sledge and Wheatley as defendants because they were not properly served. (Doc. 54). The court also found that plaintiff has failed to state a claim for which relief can be granted for (1) violation of the 1st Amendment, (2) conspiracy, (3) wrongful termination, and (4) slander. (Doc. 54).

DONE and ORDERED.


Summaries of

Henry v. Aramark Corp.

United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Southern Division
Jan 2, 2008
CIVIL ACTION NO. 05-0490-CG-C (S.D. Ala. Jan. 2, 2008)
Case details for

Henry v. Aramark Corp.

Case Details

Full title:PATRICK HENRY, Plaintiff, v. ARAMARK CORP., Defendant

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Southern Division

Date published: Jan 2, 2008

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 05-0490-CG-C (S.D. Ala. Jan. 2, 2008)