Opinion
Nos. 05-04-00610-CR, 05-04-00611-CR, 05-04-00612-CR, 05-04-00613-CR, 05-04-00614-CR, 05-04-00615-CR, 05-04-00616-CR, 05-04-00617-CR
Opinion Filed June 20, 2005. DO NOT PUBLISH. Tex.R.App.P. 47.
On Appeal from the 194th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas, Trial Court Cause Nos. F03-73899-Pum, F03-74406-Jmum, F03-74407-Jmum, F03-74408-Jum, F03-41606-Rmum, F03-41624-Pmum, F03-41629-Pmum, F04-71033-Kmum. Affirmed.
Before Justices O'NEILL, RICHTER, and FRANCIS.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
John Bryan Hendrix appeals his convictions for four aggravated robberies, three robberies, and one burglary of a building. In each case, appellant entered a nonnegotiated guilty plea to the offense and pleas of true to two enhancement paragraphs. The trial court assessed punishment at fifty years confinement for the aggravated robberies, twenty-five years confinement for the robberies, and ten years confinement for the burglary. Appellant's attorney filed a brief in which she concludes the appeals are wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Tex.Crim.App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant he has a right to file a pro se response. Appellant, however, did not file a pro se response. We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief. We agree the appeals are frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeals. We affirm the trial court's judgments.