From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hendrix v. State

COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
Aug 22, 2019
NUMBER 13-19-00288-CR (Tex. App. Aug. 22, 2019)

Opinion

NUMBER 13-19-00288-CR

08-22-2019

EVA MARIE HENDRIX, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.


On appeal from the County Court at Law of Navarro County, Texas.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Benavides, Hinojosa, and Perkes
Memorandum Opinion by Justice Hinojosa

Appellant, Eva Maria Hendrix, attempted to perfect an appeal from a conviction for forgery. We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

This case is before the Court on transfer from the Ninth Court of Appeals in Beaumont pursuant to a docket equalization order issued by the Supreme Court of Texas. See TEX. GOV'T CODE ANN. § 73.001.

Sentence in this matter was imposed on December 19, 2018. No motion for new trial was filed. Notice of appeal was filed on April 17, 2019. On June 26, 2019, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant that it appeared that the appeal was not timely perfected. Appellant was advised that the appeal would be dismissed if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of the Court's directive. Appellant has not responded to this notice.

Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.2 provides that an appeal is perfected when notice of appeal is filed within thirty days after the day sentence is imposed or suspended in open court unless a motion for new trial is timely filed. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(1). The time within which to file the notice may be enlarged if, within fifteen days after the deadline for filing the notice, the party files the notice of appeal and a motion complying with Rule 10.5(b) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See id. 26.3.

This Court's appellate jurisdiction in a criminal case is invoked by a timely filed notice of appeal. Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). "When a notice of appeal is filed within the fifteen-day period but no timely motion for extension of time is filed, the appellate court lacks jurisdiction." Olivo, 918 S.W.2d at 522. Absent a timely filed notice of appeal, a court of appeals does not obtain jurisdiction to address the merits of the appeal in a criminal case and can take no action other than to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998).

Appellant's notice of appeal, filed more than three months after sentence was imposed, was untimely, and accordingly, we lack jurisdiction over the appeal. See Slaton, 981 S.W.2d at 210.

Appellant may be entitled to an out-of-time appeal by filing a post-conviction writ of habeas corpus returnable to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals; however, the availability of that remedy is beyond the jurisdiction of this Court. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.07, § 3(a); see also Ex parte Garcia, 988 S.W.2d 240 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999).

The appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.

LETICIA HINOJOSA

Justice Do not publish.
TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b). Delivered and filed the 22nd day of August, 2019.


Summaries of

Hendrix v. State

COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
Aug 22, 2019
NUMBER 13-19-00288-CR (Tex. App. Aug. 22, 2019)
Case details for

Hendrix v. State

Case Details

Full title:EVA MARIE HENDRIX, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

Court:COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

Date published: Aug 22, 2019

Citations

NUMBER 13-19-00288-CR (Tex. App. Aug. 22, 2019)