From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Henderson v. Rattan

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 22, 2023
2:22-cv-1218 AC P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 22, 2023)

Opinion

2:22-cv-1218 AC P

06-22-2023

DARREN HENDERSON, Plaintiff, v. RATTAN, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

ALLISON CLAIRE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a request to supplement his motion to compel. ECF No. 31. The request will be denied because the motion he seeks to supplement has already been denied. ECF No. 30.

The court notes that plaintiff's request expresses concern regarding his ability to meet the upcoming deadline for the close of discovery. Plaintiff is reminded that the current deadline for completing discovery, including filing motions to compel, is July 7, 2023. ECF No. 23 at 6. If plaintiff believes he needs additional time, he may file a motion requesting an extension of time. Any such motion should state how much additional time plaintiff needs and why explain why he needs the extension.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's request to supplement his motion to compel (ECF No. 31) is DENIED.


Summaries of

Henderson v. Rattan

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 22, 2023
2:22-cv-1218 AC P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 22, 2023)
Case details for

Henderson v. Rattan

Case Details

Full title:DARREN HENDERSON, Plaintiff, v. RATTAN, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 22, 2023

Citations

2:22-cv-1218 AC P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 22, 2023)