From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Henderson v. Ohio Adult Parole Authority

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Feb 14, 2006
Case No. 2:05cv359 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 14, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. 2:05cv359.

February 14, 2006


ORDER


On July 8, 2005, plaintiff filed a motion for default judgment against defendants Jim Bedra and Christine Money. Doc. No. 21. On January 17, 2005, the magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation, recommending that plaintiff's motion for default judgment be denied. Doc. No. 26. Plaintiff has timely objected to the Report and Recommendation. Doc. No. 30.

After a de novo review of the Report and Recommendation, see Massey v. City of Ferndale, 7 F.3d 506, 509 (6th Cir. 1993), the Court concludes that plaintiff raises no argument in his objection not addressed by the Report and Recommendation. Moreover, this Court agrees with the recommended disposition of plaintiff's motion for default judgment. Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation, Doc. No. 26, is ADOPTED and AFFIRMED. Plaintiff's motion for default judgment is DENIED. Doc. No. 26.


Summaries of

Henderson v. Ohio Adult Parole Authority

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Feb 14, 2006
Case No. 2:05cv359 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 14, 2006)
Case details for

Henderson v. Ohio Adult Parole Authority

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE A. HENDERSON, Plaintiff, v. OHIO ADULT PAROLE AUTHORITY, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division

Date published: Feb 14, 2006

Citations

Case No. 2:05cv359 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 14, 2006)