From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Henderson v. New York Telephone Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 29, 1981
82 A.D.2d 908 (N.Y. App. Div. 1981)

Opinion

June 29, 1981


In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, defendants Ross, Stanto and Karlan appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Zelman, J.), entered August 1, 1980, which denied their motion to dismiss the action for failure to serve a complaint and granted plaintiff's cross motion to extend his time to serve a complaint. Order reversed, on the law, with $50 costs and disbursements, appellants' motion granted, cross motion denied, and action dismissed as against appellants. Plaintiff has failed to satisfy his burden of showing that the delay in service of the complaint is excusable and that his claim is meritorious (see Barash v Micucci, 49 N.Y.2d 594). Gulotta, J.P., Cohalan, O'Connor and Bracken, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Henderson v. New York Telephone Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 29, 1981
82 A.D.2d 908 (N.Y. App. Div. 1981)
Case details for

Henderson v. New York Telephone Company

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS HENDERSON, Respondent, v. NEW YORK TELEPHONE COMPANY et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 29, 1981

Citations

82 A.D.2d 908 (N.Y. App. Div. 1981)