From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Henderson Apartments, LLC v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court of State

Supreme Court of Nevada.
Jun 14, 2012
381 P.3d 620 (Nev. 2012)

Opinion

No. 60792.

06-14-2012

HENDERSON APARTMENTS, LLC, A Nevada Limited Liability Company; Farid Henderson, LLC, A Nevada Limited Liability Company; Farid Amid, an individual; and Farzad Amid, an individual, Petitioners, v. The EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF the STATE of Nevada, in and for the COUNTY OF CLARK; and the Honorable David B. Barker, Daistrict Judge, Respondents, and Coastline re Holdings Corporation, A California Corporation as real party in interest in place of Pacific Western Bank, A California State-chartered Bank, Successor to Affinity Bank, Real Party in Interest.

Iglody Law The Law Offices of Paras B. Barnett, PLLC Gordon & Silver, Ltd.


Iglody Law

The Law Offices of Paras B. Barnett, PLLC

Gordon & Silver, Ltd.

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR PROHIBITION

This original petition for a writ of mandamus or prohibition challenges a district court order applying California law in a deficiency judgment action.

A writ of mandamus is available to compel an act that the law requires or to control an arbitrary or capricious exercise of discretion. NRS 34.160 ; International Game Tech. v. Dist. Ct., 124 Nev. 193, 197, 179 P.3d 556, 558 (2008). A writ of prohibition is available when a district court acts without or in excess of its jurisdiction. NRS 34.320 ; State of Nevada v. Dist. Ct. (Anzalone), 118 Nev. 140, 146–47, 42 P.3d 233, 237 (2002). Neither writ is appropriate when the petitioner has a plain, speedy, and adequate remedy at law, NRS 34.170 ; NRS 34.330, and we have consistently held that an appeal is generally an adequate legal remedy precluding writ relief. Pan v. Dist. Ct., 120 Nev. 222, 224, 88 P.3d 840, 841 (2004).

Having reviewed the petition and its supporting documents, we are not persuaded that writ relief is warranted. In particular, petitioners have an adequate legal remedy in the form of an appeal from any final judgment. Id. Accordingly, we deny the petition. Id.; NRAP 21(b)(1).

Petitioners' motion for a stay is denied as moot in light of this order.


It is so ORDERED.


Summaries of

Henderson Apartments, LLC v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court of State

Supreme Court of Nevada.
Jun 14, 2012
381 P.3d 620 (Nev. 2012)
Case details for

Henderson Apartments, LLC v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court of State

Case Details

Full title:HENDERSON APARTMENTS, LLC, A Nevada Limited Liability Company; Farid…

Court:Supreme Court of Nevada.

Date published: Jun 14, 2012

Citations

381 P.3d 620 (Nev. 2012)