From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hemstreet v. Schade

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
May 15, 1972
459 F.2d 49 (9th Cir. 1972)

Opinion

No. 71-2667.

April 14, 1972. Rehearing Denied May 15, 1972.

Eleanor M. Hemstreet, in pro. per.

William D. Keller, U.S. Atty., Matthew A. Schumacher, Frederick M. Brosio, Jr., Asst. U.S. Attys., Los Angeles, Cal., Christopher M. Reuss, San Francisco, Cal., for appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California.

Before KOELSCH, DUNIWAY and GOODWIN, Circuit Judges.


Eleanor M. Hemstreet appeals from an order dismissing her complaint, under Fed.R.Civ.P. 8.

A dismissal of a complaint, without dismissal of the action, is not a "final order" under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Dockery v. Dockery, 437 F.2d 898 (9th Cir. 1971). No "special circumstances" here indicate that the complaint could not be saved by amendment. The order appealed from is not an appealable order. Jackson v. Nelson, 405 F.2d 872, 873 (9th Cir. 1968).

The appeal is accordingly dismissed for lack of appellate jurisdiction. Plaintiff may move in the district court for leave to file an amended complaint. Thereafter, further proceedings should be governed by the procedure outlined in Potter v. McCall, 433 F.2d 1087 (9th Cir. 1970).

Dismissed.


Summaries of

Hemstreet v. Schade

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
May 15, 1972
459 F.2d 49 (9th Cir. 1972)
Case details for

Hemstreet v. Schade

Case Details

Full title:ELEANOR M. HEMSTREET, MEMBER, CONCERNED CITIZENS OF JUSTICE, INC.…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: May 15, 1972

Citations

459 F.2d 49 (9th Cir. 1972)

Citing Cases

Jones v. Pitchess

Accordingly the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Hemstreet v. Schade, 459 F.2d 49 (9th Cir.…