From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hemsley v. Traquina

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 19, 2013
No. 2:12-cv-2930 JAM JFM P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 19, 2013)

Opinion

No. 2:12-cv-2930 JAM JFM P

03-19-2013

JOHN HEMSLEY, Plaintiff, v. TRAQUINA, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff has requested the appointment of counsel. The United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). In the present case, the court does not find the required exceptional circumstances. Plaintiff's request for the appointment of counsel will therefore be denied.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's February 25, 2013 motion for the appointment of counsel (Doc. No. 14) is denied.

_________________________

EDMUND F. BRENNAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Hemsley v. Traquina

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 19, 2013
No. 2:12-cv-2930 JAM JFM P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 19, 2013)
Case details for

Hemsley v. Traquina

Case Details

Full title:JOHN HEMSLEY, Plaintiff, v. TRAQUINA, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 19, 2013

Citations

No. 2:12-cv-2930 JAM JFM P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 19, 2013)