From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hemphill v. Ohio

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Nov 13, 2018
Case No. 1:18-cv-497 (S.D. Ohio Nov. 13, 2018)

Opinion

Case No. 1:18-cv-497

11-13-2018

MARCUS HEMPHILL, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF OHIO (ODRC), Defendant.


Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz

ORDER ADOPTNG THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 6) AND TERMINATING THIS CASE IN THIS COURT

This case is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference to United States Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings filed with this Court and submitted a Report and Recommendation. (Doc. 6). Plaintiff filed an Objection. (Doc. 7).

Plaintiff's Objection does not contain any argument or authority indicating that the Magistrate Judge erred in concluding that Plaintiff failed to states a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 or the Americans with Disabilities Act, and, accordingly, is OVERRULED. --------

As required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court has reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de novo all of the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court does determine that such Report and Recommendation should be and is hereby adopted in its entirety. Accordingly:

1. The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 6) is ADOPTED;
2. Plaintiff's Objection (Doc. 7) is OVERRULED;

3. Plaintiff's claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and the Americans with Disabilities Act are DISMISSED with prejudice;

4. To the extent Plaintiff's Complaint asserts state law claims, the Court DECLINES to exercise supplemental jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3) and DISMISSES any such state law claims without prejudice;

5. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal of this Order would not be taken in good faith;

6. Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED; and

7. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly, whereupon this case is TERMINATED in this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: 11/13/18

/s/_________

Timothy S. Black

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Hemphill v. Ohio

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Nov 13, 2018
Case No. 1:18-cv-497 (S.D. Ohio Nov. 13, 2018)
Case details for

Hemphill v. Ohio

Case Details

Full title:MARCUS HEMPHILL, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF OHIO (ODRC), Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Nov 13, 2018

Citations

Case No. 1:18-cv-497 (S.D. Ohio Nov. 13, 2018)

Citing Cases

Chapman v. Franklin Cnty. Sheriff

Moreover, a prisoner does not state a claim for relief under the ADA for the denial of medical treatment…