Hemopet v. Hill's Pet Nutrition, Inc.

Full title: HEMOPET, Plaintiff, v. HILL'S PET NUTRITION, INC., Defendant.

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 15, 2015

Case No.: SACV 12-01908-JLS (JPRx) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 15, 2015)

Opinion

Case No.: SACV 12-01908-JLS (JPRx)

01-15-2015

HEMOPET, Plaintiff, v. HILL'S PET NUTRITION, INC., Defendant.

Honorable Josephine L. Staton

JUDGMENT

The Court, having considered Defendant Hill's Pet Nutrition, Inc. Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 93), the arguments and evidence presented in the moving, opposition and reply papers and at oral argument, and a decision granting Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment having been duly rendered on November 24, 2014 (Doc. 119), deciding that claims 1 and 2 of U.S. Patent No. 7,865,343, claims 1, 2, 9, and 10 of U.S. Patent No. 8,060,354, claim 1 of U.S. Patent 8,234,099, and claims 1 and 8 of U.S. Patent No. 8,224,587 are invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 101:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Judgment is entered in favor of Defendant Hill's Pet Nutrition, Inc. Dated: January 15, 2015

SO ORDERED:

/s/_________

Honorable Josephine L. Staton

United States District Judge