From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hemingway v. Hemingway

Connecticut Superior Court, Judicial District of Stamford-Norwalk at Stamford
Mar 5, 1999
1999 Ct. Sup. 2851 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1999)

Opinion

No. FA 96-0152457 S

March 5, 1999


MEMORANDUM OF DECISION de PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO STRIKE COUNTERCLAIM (303) CT Page 2852


The plaintiff added defendant Andreades to this dissolution suit by alleging a count of fraudulent transfer which occurred when the defendant husband paid money to assist the defendant Andreades in acquiring title. The defendant Andreades now pleads an abuse of process counterclaim to which the plaintiff's Motion to Strike is now directed.

A fraudulent conveyance cause of action may be joined in a dissolution action, Gaudio v. Gaudio, 23 Conn. App. 287. The defendant's alleged delivery of money to the third party, thereby reducing his assets is a proper basis for the fraud count in this case, Tessitore v. Tessitore, 31 Conn. App. 40.

The Motion to Strike is granted.

So Ordered.

HARRIGAN, J.


Summaries of

Hemingway v. Hemingway

Connecticut Superior Court, Judicial District of Stamford-Norwalk at Stamford
Mar 5, 1999
1999 Ct. Sup. 2851 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1999)
Case details for

Hemingway v. Hemingway

Case Details

Full title:KAREN P. HEMINGWAY vs. ALFRED H. HEMINGWAY, JR. and SANDRA ANDREADES

Court:Connecticut Superior Court, Judicial District of Stamford-Norwalk at Stamford

Date published: Mar 5, 1999

Citations

1999 Ct. Sup. 2851 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1999)

Citing Cases

State ex Rel. Gaynor v. Gaynor Electric Co., Inc.

Baydrop vs. Second National Bank, supra; State ex rel. Costelo vs. Middlesex Banking Co., supra. From which…