From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Helvig v. Mazak Optonics Corp.

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
May 17, 2010
Civil No. 08-6444 (JRT/FLN) (D. Minn. May. 17, 2010)

Opinion

Civil No. 08-6444 (JRT/FLN).

May 17, 2010

William Mahler, WILLIAM MAHLER LAW FIRM, Rochester, MN, for plaintiffs.

Michael Vellon, Robert Brownson, and Patrick Biren, BROWNSON BALLOU, PLLP, Minneapolis, MN, for defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION


The above-entitled matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Franklin L. Noel, dated April 22, 2010. An objection was filed to said Report and Recommendation, but later withdrawn by Defendant Mazak Optonics Corporation [Docket No. 42].

Based upon the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and all of the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's motion for partial summary judgment [Docket No. 15] is DENIED.

Dated: May 14, 2010

at Minneapolis, Minnesota


Summaries of

Helvig v. Mazak Optonics Corp.

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
May 17, 2010
Civil No. 08-6444 (JRT/FLN) (D. Minn. May. 17, 2010)
Case details for

Helvig v. Mazak Optonics Corp.

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL HELVIG AND CAROL HELVIG, Plaintiffs, v. MAZAK OPTONICS CORP.…

Court:United States District Court, D. Minnesota

Date published: May 17, 2010

Citations

Civil No. 08-6444 (JRT/FLN) (D. Minn. May. 17, 2010)