From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Helums v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Feb 11, 1930
126 So. 183 (Ala. Crim. App. 1930)

Opinion

8 Div. 54.

February 11, 1930.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Franklin County; Charles P. Almon, Judge.

Ed Helums was convicted of manufacturing prohibited liquors, and he appeals. Reversed and remanded.

Travis Williams, of Russellville, for appellant.

The trial court has no authority of law to put one man to trial along with another, except by consent, and that consent should be shown by the record.

Charlie C. McCall, Atty. Gen., for the State.

Brief did not reach the Reporter.


This appeal is on the record which discloses that this defendant was alone indicted and tried jointly with another separately indicted and charged with the same offense. There is nothing in the record to show that the joint trial was with the consent of defendant or that he had waived the right to a separate trial. Being separately indicted, the defendant is entitled to a separate trial, and a joint trial with another without the consent of the defendant or a waiver of the right by him appearing of record is error and cause for reversal. Martin v. State, 19 Ala. App. 432, 97 So. 768.

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

Helums v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Feb 11, 1930
126 So. 183 (Ala. Crim. App. 1930)
Case details for

Helums v. State

Case Details

Full title:HELUMS v. STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Alabama

Date published: Feb 11, 1930

Citations

126 So. 183 (Ala. Crim. App. 1930)
23 Ala. App. 401

Citing Cases

Tice v. State

Sullivan argues that retroactive application of the rule allowing consolidation of defendants is prohibited…

Holsemback v. State

In this state, we have found only three cases which address the issue of the separate indictment of two…