From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

HELSABECK v. VASS

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Oct 1, 1930
155 S.E. 924 (N.C. 1930)

Opinion

(Filed 22 October, 1930.)

APPEAL by defendant, H.F. Vass, from Johnson, Special Judge, at March Term, 1930, of FORSYTH.

W. T. Wilson and Chas. R. Helsabeck for plaintiff.

J. E. Alexander and Lacy M. Butler for defendant, appellant.


Civil action to restrain sale of property under execution.

From a verdict and judgment in favor of plaintiff, the defendant, H.F. Vass, appeals, assigning errors.


The trial of the case accords substantially with the opinion rendered on the first appeal, 196 N.C. 603, 146 S.E. 576, and it would serve no useful purpose to reiterate the facts or to restate the contentions of the parties. The record is apparently free from reversible error. The verdict and judgment will be upheld.

No error.


Summaries of

HELSABECK v. VASS

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Oct 1, 1930
155 S.E. 924 (N.C. 1930)
Case details for

HELSABECK v. VASS

Case Details

Full title:E. A. HELSABECK v. H.F. VASS ET AL

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Oct 1, 1930

Citations

155 S.E. 924 (N.C. 1930)
199 N.C. 812