From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Helmbrecht v. Krauthamer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 5, 1997
239 A.D.2d 316 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

May 5, 1997

Appeal from Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Underwood, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

We agree with the Supreme Court's conclusion that the defendant established a prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law that the plaintiff did not sustain serious injury as defined by Insurance Law § 5102(d) ( see, Nicosia v. Straberg, 236 A.D.2d 595; Locasio v. Astoria Bus Co., 236 A.D.2d 447). The evidence adduced by the plaintiff in opposition failed to rebut the defendant's prima facie showing ( see, Williams v. Toshiko, 237 A.D.2d 350; Nicosia v. Straberg, supra). Therefore, the court correctly awarded summary judgment to the defendants.

Miller, J.P., Thompson, Joy and Luciano, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Helmbrecht v. Krauthamer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 5, 1997
239 A.D.2d 316 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Helmbrecht v. Krauthamer

Case Details

Full title:CAROLYN HELMBRECHT, Appellant, v. MICHAEL KRAUTHAMER et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 5, 1997

Citations

239 A.D.2d 316 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
657 N.Y.S.2d 991

Citing Cases

Kisloff v. State

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs. The submissions made by the defendant State of New York…