From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Helm v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Aug 27, 2002
84 S.W.3d 138 (Mo. Ct. App. 2002)

Opinion

No. ED 80298

August 27, 2002

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Gary Gaertner, Jr., Judge.

Mark A. Grothoff, Asst. Public Defender, Columbia, MO, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Dora A. Fichter, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before Mary R. Russell, P.J., Clifford H. Ahrens, J. and James R. Dowd, J.



ORDER


Movant, Donnie Helm, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We previously affirmed Movant's conviction for kidnapping in violation of section 565.110, RSMo 2000.State v. Helm, 14 S.W.3d 642 (Mo.App.E.D. 2000). He now contends his counsel provided ineffective assistance by failing to impeach the credibility of the State's key witness.

Having reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, we conclude the motion court did not clearly err. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum opinion setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Helm v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Aug 27, 2002
84 S.W.3d 138 (Mo. Ct. App. 2002)
Case details for

Helm v. State

Case Details

Full title:Donnie Helm, Movant/Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three

Date published: Aug 27, 2002

Citations

84 S.W.3d 138 (Mo. Ct. App. 2002)