From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Helm v. Lookingbill

United States District Court, Western District of Arkansas
Jun 17, 2022
3:21-CV-3035 (W.D. Ark. Jun. 17, 2022)

Opinion

3:21-CV-3035

06-17-2022

JASON HARLEY HELM PLAINTIFF v. CAPTAIN LOOKINGBILL, et al. DEFENDANTS


ORDER

TIMOTHY L. BROOKS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Comes on for consideration the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 76) filed in this case on May 26, 2022, by the Honorable Mark E. Ford, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. Fourteen (14) days have passed without objections being filed by the parties.

The Court has reviewed this case and, being well and sufficiently advised, finds as follows: the Report and Recommendation is proper and should be and hereby is ADOPTED IN ITS ENTIRETY. Accordingly, for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation, the Motions for Summary Judgment (Docs. 52 & 66) are GRANTED in PART and DENIED in PART as follows:

• the motions are GRANTED regarding Helm's first claim concerning the events of December 25, 26, and 27, 2020; and
• the motions are DENIED regarding Helm's second and third claims.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Helm v. Lookingbill

United States District Court, Western District of Arkansas
Jun 17, 2022
3:21-CV-3035 (W.D. Ark. Jun. 17, 2022)
Case details for

Helm v. Lookingbill

Case Details

Full title:JASON HARLEY HELM PLAINTIFF v. CAPTAIN LOOKINGBILL, et al. DEFENDANTS

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Arkansas

Date published: Jun 17, 2022

Citations

3:21-CV-3035 (W.D. Ark. Jun. 17, 2022)