From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hellmich Borbonus v. Essen

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Dec 21, 2010
325 S.W.3d 542 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010)

Opinion

No. ED94161.

October 12, 2010. Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied November 17, 2010. Application for Transfer Denied December 21, 2010.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, 07SL-AC04515, Patrick Clifford, Judge.

Jane C. Hogan, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.

Vincent D. Vogler, James E. Klenc, St. Louis, MO, for Respondent.

Before GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., P.J., and MARY K. HOFF, J., and PATRICIA L. COHEN, J.



ORDER


Carl D. Essen (Essen) appeals from the trial court's judgment in favor of King, Krehbiel, Hellmich, and Borbonus, LLC (Respondent). Following a bench trial, the trial court found that Respondent was entitled to recover on a contract for an account of $5,475.00 plus interest. We find that substantial evidence supports the trial court's judgment and we affirm the judgment.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find Essen is entitled to no relief on appeal. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the trial court's judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Hellmich Borbonus v. Essen

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Dec 21, 2010
325 S.W.3d 542 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010)
Case details for

Hellmich Borbonus v. Essen

Case Details

Full title:KING, KREHBIEL, HELLMICH BORBONUS, LLC, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Carl D…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District

Date published: Dec 21, 2010

Citations

325 S.W.3d 542 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010)