From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Heller v. Nobel Insurance Group

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Feb 2, 2000
753 So. 2d 841 (La. 2000)

Opinion

No. 2000-CC-0261

February 2, 2000

IN RE: Nobel Insurance Group Et Al; Andrews Transport Inc.; Langley, Alcide; — Defendant(s); Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Calcasieu, 14th Judicial District Court Div. E, Nos. 97-8701; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. W99-1846


Granted. The trial court's ruling on the motion in limine does not represent a clear abuse of the trial court's great discretion in evidentiary matters. Accordingly, the judgment of the court of appeal is reversed, and the judgment of the trial court is reinstated. Case remanded to the trial court for further proceedings.

WFM

CDK

JPV

CDT

JTK

CALOGERO, C.J., not on panel.

LEMMON, J., dissents from the order.

JOHNSON, J., dissents from the order.


Summaries of

Heller v. Nobel Insurance Group

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Feb 2, 2000
753 So. 2d 841 (La. 2000)
Case details for

Heller v. Nobel Insurance Group

Case Details

Full title:REBECCA C. HELLER v. NOBEL INSURANCE GROUP, ET AL

Court:Supreme Court of Louisiana

Date published: Feb 2, 2000

Citations

753 So. 2d 841 (La. 2000)

Citing Cases

Taylor v. Dowling Gosslee

A motion in limine presents an evidentiary matter that is subject to the great discretion of the trial court.…

Shaw v. Alexandria Inv. Grp., LLC

Because this motion presents an evidentiary issue, the trial court is granted great discretion, and its…