From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Heller v. Molina

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jan 31, 2023
22-cv-07142-WHO (PR) (N.D. Cal. Jan. 31, 2023)

Opinion

22-cv-07142-WHO (PR)

01-31-2023

MARK ANTHONY HELLER, Plaintiff, v. CARLOS MOLINA, et al., Defendants.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

AWUAM H. ORRICK UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Mail sent by the Court to plaintiff was returned as undeliverable more than 60 days ago. (Dkt. No. 4.) Accordingly, this federal civil rights action is DISMISSED (without prejudice) because plaintiff failed to keep the Court apprised of his current address pursuant to Civil Local Rule 3-11(b) and because he failed to prosecute this matter, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Because this dismissal is without prejudice, plaintiff may move to reopen the action. Any motion to reopen must have the words MOTION TO REOPEN written on the first page.

The Clerk shall enter judgment in favor of defendants, and close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Heller v. Molina

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jan 31, 2023
22-cv-07142-WHO (PR) (N.D. Cal. Jan. 31, 2023)
Case details for

Heller v. Molina

Case Details

Full title:MARK ANTHONY HELLER, Plaintiff, v. CARLOS MOLINA, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Jan 31, 2023

Citations

22-cv-07142-WHO (PR) (N.D. Cal. Jan. 31, 2023)