Opinion
No. 85862
01-05-2023
Peter Jason HELFRICH, Petitioner, v. The FIFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT of the State of Nevada, IN AND FOR the COUNTY OF NYE; and the Honorable David R. Gamble, Senior Judge, Respondents.
ORDER DENYING PETITION
This is a pro se original petition for a writ of mandamus seeking an order that would compel the district court to calendar petitioner's motion for an evidentiary hearing within 90 days.
A writ of mandamus is available to compel the performance of an act that the law requires as a duty resulting from an office, trust, or station or to control an arbitrary or capricious exercise of discretion. See NRS 34.160 ; Int'l Game Tech., Inc. v. Second Judicial Dist. Court , 124 Nev. 193, 197, 179 P.3d 556, 558 (2008). Whether a petition for extraordinary writ relief will be entertained rests within this court's sound discretion. D.H. Horton, Inc. v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 123 Nev. 468, 474-75, 168 P.3d 731, 736-37 (2007). Petitioner bears the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted. Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004). Further, it is petitioner's responsibility to provide this court with all documents essential to understand the matters set forth in the petition. NRAP 21(a)(4).
Having reviewed the petition and the limited documents provided in support by petitioner, we conclude, without reaching the merits of any claims, that petitioner has failed to meet his burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted. Accordingly, we
ORDER the petition DENIED.