From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Helena Agri-Enters. v. Johnson

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Sep 13, 2022
2:19CV00116 LPR (E.D. Ark. Sep. 13, 2022)

Opinion

2:19CV00116 LPR

09-13-2022

HELENA AGRI-ENTERPRISES, LLC PLAINTIFF v. ESLEY JOHNSON, JR. DEFENDANT SOUTHERN BANCORP BANK GARNISHEE

AGREED AS TO FORM AND SUBSTANCE: Ralph D. Scott LAX, VAUGHAN, FORTSON, ROWE & THREET, P.A. Attorneys for Helena Agri-Enterprises, LLC Edward H. Schieffler, SCHIEFFLER LAW FIRM Attorney for the Johnsons Jacob P. Fair WRIGHT, LINDSEY & JENNINGS LLP


AGREED AS TO FORM AND SUBSTANCE:

Ralph D. Scott

LAX, VAUGHAN, FORTSON,

ROWE & THREET, P.A.

Attorneys for Helena Agri-Enterprises, LLC

Edward H. Schieffler,

SCHIEFFLER LAW FIRM

Attorney for the Johnsons

Jacob P. Fair

WRIGHT, LINDSEY & JENNINGS LLP

AGREED ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND FOR ORDER DIRECTING GARNISHEE TO PAY OVER FUNDS

HONORABLE LEE P. RUDOFSKY, DISTRICT JUDGE

Pending before the Court is the motion for summary judgment and for order directing garnishee to pay over funds, filed by the Helena Agri-Enterprises, LLC f/k/a Helena Chemical Company (“Helena”), and the response thereto filed by the defendant Esley E. Johnson Jr. (the “Defendant”). Based on the pleadings, the pending writ of garnishment directed to garnishee Southern Bancorp Bank (“Garnishee”) and the answer thereto of Garnishee, and based upon the agreement of Helena; the Defendant, together with his spouse, Cassie Johnson, and son, Gage Johnson (together with the defendant, the “Johnsons”); and Garnishee, all as indicated by the signatures of their undersigned counsel, the Court does hereby find and order as follows:

1. In aid of execution of the Judgment entered herein, as amended, Helena has caused to be issued a Writ of Garnishment and accompanying Garnishment Allegations and Interrogatories, directed to Garnishee (the “Writ of Garnishment”). (Doc. No. 13.) The Writ of Garnishment was served on Garnishee on or about March 27, 2020.

2. Garnishee has confirmed that it is indebted to the Defendant, and is currently holding property on behalf of the Defendant pursuant to the Writ of Garnishment in the total amount of $29,097.83, consisting of funds from: (a) a joint checking account with a balance on the date that Garnishee was served with the Writ of Garnishment of $1,968.43; and (b) a Certificate of Deposit with a balance of $27,279.40 on the date that Garnishee was served with the Writ of Garnishment (collectively, the “Garnishment Proceeds”).

3. On September 1, 2021, Helena filed a motion for summary judgment and for order directing garnishee to pay over the Garnishment Proceeds which it holds. (Doc. Nos. 3436.) The Defendant filed a response objecting to the motion on September 15, 2021 (Doc. No. 53), and Helena filed a reply to the response on September 22, 2021 (Doc. No. 55). Through its motion and reply, Helena has asserted that all of the Garnishment Proceeds are subject to the Writ of Garnishment. Through his response, the Defendant has disputed that all or part of the Garnishment Proceeds are subject to the Writ of Garnishment.

4. Consistent with the findings contained herein and the agreement of the parties, as further provided below, Helena's motion is hereby GRANTED IN PART, and DENIED IN PART.

5. The Court hereby finds and orders that all of the funds held by Garnishee in the joint checking account held by Garnishee, in the total amount of $1,968.43, are subject to the Writ of Garnishment, and duly and properly payable to Helena without further delay or dispute. The Court further finds that the sum of $17,000.00 from the balance of the Certificate of Deposit held by Garnishee is also subject to the Writ of Garnishment, and duly and properly payable to Helena without further delay or dispute.

6. Accordingly, Helena is entitled to receive a total amount of $18,968.43 from the funds held by Garnishee pursuant to the Writ of Garnishment. No dispute of material fact remains as to Helena's entitlement to such amount, and Helena is entitled to summary judgment with respect to such amount as a matter of law. The Court finds that the remaining amount of the Garnishment Proceeds over and above the sum of $18,968.43 is not subject to the Writ of Garnishment and shall be unfrozen within three (3) business days of entry of this order.

7. Consistent with these findings, Garnishee is hereby ordered to pay immediately to Helena the total sum of $18,968.43 subject to the Writ of Garnishment on the date that Garnishee was served with the Writ of Garnishment. Garnishee is further directed to release any hold or freeze on the remaining Garnishment Proceeds it holds. Upon payment of the sum of $18,968.43 to Helena, Garnishee shall be discharged from any further liability herein under the Writ of Garnishment and dismissed from this proceeding.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Helena Agri-Enters. v. Johnson

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Sep 13, 2022
2:19CV00116 LPR (E.D. Ark. Sep. 13, 2022)
Case details for

Helena Agri-Enters. v. Johnson

Case Details

Full title:HELENA AGRI-ENTERPRISES, LLC PLAINTIFF v. ESLEY JOHNSON, JR. DEFENDANT…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas

Date published: Sep 13, 2022

Citations

2:19CV00116 LPR (E.D. Ark. Sep. 13, 2022)