From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hejazi v. Saydack Law LLC

Court of Appeals of Oregon
Sep 15, 2021
314 Or. App. 614 (Or. Ct. App. 2021)

Opinion

A175301

09-15-2021

HAMID MICHAEL HEJAZI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SAYDACK LAW LLC and Jessica Saydack, Defendants.

Hamid Michael Hejazi filed the brief pro se.


Submitted August 6, 2021.

Lane County Circuit Court 20AD0013; Amit K. Kapoor, Judge.

Hamid Michael Hejazi filed the brief pro se.

Before Lagesen, Presiding Judge, and James, Judge, and Kamins, Judge.

PER CURIAM

As allowed under ORS 19.205(2), and explained in Stanwood v. Multnomah County, 135 Or.App. 58, 60, 898 P.2d 196 (1995), plaintiff appeals an order denying his request for a waiver or deferral of filing fees and sheriffs service fees. Plaintiffs opening brief, however, contains no argument, and we affirm for that reason. See Smith v. Dept. of Corrections (A170818), 314 Or.App. 1, ___ P.3d ___ (2021) (affirming denial of fee waiver where the appellant's brief contained no pertinent argument).

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Hejazi v. Saydack Law LLC

Court of Appeals of Oregon
Sep 15, 2021
314 Or. App. 614 (Or. Ct. App. 2021)
Case details for

Hejazi v. Saydack Law LLC

Case Details

Full title:HAMID MICHAEL HEJAZI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SAYDACK LAW LLC and Jessica…

Court:Court of Appeals of Oregon

Date published: Sep 15, 2021

Citations

314 Or. App. 614 (Or. Ct. App. 2021)