From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Heitkoetter v. Domm

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 1, 2023
1:22-cv-00368-ADA-BAM (E.D. Cal. Jun. 1, 2023)

Opinion

1:22-cv-00368-ADA-BAM

06-01-2023

MARKUS HEITKOETTER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. KARL DOMM, Defendant.


ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT

(Doc. 61)

BARBARA A. MCAULIFFE, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

On May 31, 2023, Plaintiffs Markus Heitkoetter and Rockwell Trading Services LLC and Defendant Robert Domm (aka Karl Domm) filed a joint stipulation to extend the deadline for Defendant to respond to Plaintiffs' Third Amended Complaint. (Doc. 61). The parties requested the deadline for Defendant's response be extended from June 5, 2023, to June 12, 2023.

For cause appearing, the parties' stipulation is GRANTED. Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs' Third Amended Complaint on or before June 12, 2023.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Heitkoetter v. Domm

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 1, 2023
1:22-cv-00368-ADA-BAM (E.D. Cal. Jun. 1, 2023)
Case details for

Heitkoetter v. Domm

Case Details

Full title:MARKUS HEITKOETTER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. KARL DOMM, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 1, 2023

Citations

1:22-cv-00368-ADA-BAM (E.D. Cal. Jun. 1, 2023)