From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Heissenbuttel v. Meagher

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 29, 1914
162 App. Div. 752 (N.Y. App. Div. 1914)

Summary

In Heissenbuttel v. Meagher (162 App. Div. 752; affd., 221 N.Y. 511) this court reversed a judgment in favor of the plaintiff and dismissed the complaint where the plaintiff was injured by an automobile owned by defendant and driven by his son, twenty-four years of age, a law student living with his father as a member of his family.

Summary of this case from Kohlmeier v. Allen

Opinion

May 29, 1914.

Stephen P. Anderton, for the appellant.

Abraham Gruber, for the respondent.


The plaintiff, while standing in a public street waiting for a surface car, was struck and injured by an automobile belonging to defendant and driven by his son, a young man twenty-four years of age. This son was pursuing his studies as a law student and lived with his father as a member of his family. The automobile was a pleasure vehicle kept by defendant for the use of himself and his family; his son was privileged to use it for his individual purposes whenever he so desired. It was customary also for the son to act as chauffeur of the car when it was used by defendant or other members of the family. On the occasion of the accident the son had taken the car out for a pleasure drive accompanied by several of his friends. Neither defendant nor any other member of his family, except his son, was in the party. It is evident from these facts that when the accident happened the car was neither expressly nor constructively in the use or service of the defendant, and that in driving the car the son was in no way acting as the defendant's agent. Under these circumstances we hold that defendant is not liable for his son's negligent operation of the car. The principle involved has been applied in so many cases that the citation of but a few will suffice. ( Tanzer v. Read, 160 App. Div. 584; Freibaum v. Brady, 143 id. 220; Cunningham v. Castle, 127 id. 580; Maher v. Benedict, 123 id. 579.)

The judgment and order appealed from should be reversed, with costs, and the complaint dismissed, with costs.

INGRAHAM, P.J., McLAUGHLIN, LAUGHLIN and DOWLING, JJ., concurred.

Judgment and order reversed, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs. Order to be settled on notice.


Summaries of

Heissenbuttel v. Meagher

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 29, 1914
162 App. Div. 752 (N.Y. App. Div. 1914)

In Heissenbuttel v. Meagher (162 App. Div. 752; affd., 221 N.Y. 511) this court reversed a judgment in favor of the plaintiff and dismissed the complaint where the plaintiff was injured by an automobile owned by defendant and driven by his son, twenty-four years of age, a law student living with his father as a member of his family.

Summary of this case from Kohlmeier v. Allen
Case details for

Heissenbuttel v. Meagher

Case Details

Full title:ADELE HEISSENBUTTEL, Respondent, v . MARK C. MEAGHER, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 29, 1914

Citations

162 App. Div. 752 (N.Y. App. Div. 1914)
147 N.Y.S. 1087

Citing Cases

Van Blaricom v. Dodgson

July, 1915. Judgment and order reversed and complaint dismissed as to the appellant Frank L. Dodgson, with…

Van Blaricom v. Dodgson

If, contrary to ordinary rules, the owner of a car ought to be responsible for the carelessness of every one…