Heinz v. State

Full title: John Paul HEINZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.

Date published: Apr 3, 2018

544 S.W.3d 314 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)

Opinion

No. ED 105457

04-03-2018

John Paul HEINZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

FOR APPELLANT: Ellen H. Flottman, Public Defender’s Office, Woodrail Centre, 1000 West Nifong, Building 7, Suite 100, Columbia, MO 65203. FOR RESPONDENT: Joshua D. Hawley, Attorney General, Robert J. Bartholomew, Asst. Atty. Gen., P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102.

PER CURIAM.

FOR APPELLANT: Ellen H. Flottman, Public Defender’s Office, Woodrail Centre, 1000 West Nifong, Building 7, Suite 100, Columbia, MO 65203.

FOR RESPONDENT: Joshua D. Hawley, Attorney General, Robert J. Bartholomew, Asst. Atty. Gen., P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102.

Before Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., P.J., Robert M. Clayton III, J., Angela T. Quigless, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.John Paul Heinz appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).