Opinion
No. ED 105457
04-03-2018
John Paul HEINZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
FOR APPELLANT: Ellen H. Flottman, Public Defender’s Office, Woodrail Centre, 1000 West Nifong, Building 7, Suite 100, Columbia, MO 65203. FOR RESPONDENT: Joshua D. Hawley, Attorney General, Robert J. Bartholomew, Asst. Atty. Gen., P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102.
FOR APPELLANT: Ellen H. Flottman, Public Defender’s Office, Woodrail Centre, 1000 West Nifong, Building 7, Suite 100, Columbia, MO 65203.
FOR RESPONDENT: Joshua D. Hawley, Attorney General, Robert J. Bartholomew, Asst. Atty. Gen., P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102.
Before Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., P.J., Robert M. Clayton III, J., Angela T. Quigless, J.
ORDER
PER CURIAM.John Paul Heinz appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.
No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).