From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Heinichen v. Kelly

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
May 6, 2014
117 A.D.3d 441 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)

Opinion

2014-05-6

In re Raymond HEINICHEN, Petitioner–Appellant, v. Raymond W. KELLY, etc, et al., Respondents–Respondents.

Ungaro & Cifuni, New York (Nicholas Cifuni of counsel), for appellant. Jeffrey D. Friedlander, Acting Corporation Counsel, New York (Keith M. Snow of counsel), for respondents.



Ungaro & Cifuni, New York (Nicholas Cifuni of counsel), for appellant. Jeffrey D. Friedlander, Acting Corporation Counsel, New York (Keith M. Snow of counsel), for respondents.
GONZALEZ, P.J., MAZZARELLI, SWEENY, MANZANET–DANIELS, CLARK, JJ.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Louis B. York, J.), entered May 7, 2013, denying the petition to annul respondent Board of Trustees' denial of petitioner's application for accident disability retirement benefits, and dismissing the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The determination that petitioner's line of duty injury was not sustained in an accident had a rational basis ( see Administrative Code § 13–252; Matter of Canfora v. Board of Trustees of Police Pension Fund of Police Dept. of City of N.Y., Art. II, 60 N.Y.2d 347, 469 N.Y.S.2d 635, 457 N.E.2d 740 [1983] ). Petitioner was injured when, while working behind a desk, he forcibly attempted to close a stuck drawer, the drawer abruptly gave way, and he slammed his right thumb on the face of the drawer. The closing of the drawer, a routine task, was not an accident, namely, a “sudden, fortuitous mischance, unexpected, out of the ordinary, and injurious in impact” (Matter of Lichtenstein v. Board of Trustees of Police Pension Fund of Police Dept. of City of N.Y., Art. II, 57 N.Y.2d 1010, 1012, 457 N.Y.S.2d 472, 443 N.E.2d 946 [1982] [internal quotation marks omitted] ). Rather, it was the foreseeable and intended result of petitioner's own conduct ( see e.g. Matter of Hopp v. Kelly, 4 A.D.3d 176, 772 N.Y.S.2d 31 [1st Dept.2004];Matter of Bottino v. Murphy, 209 A.D.2d 335, 619 N.Y.S.2d 11 [1st Dept.1994];compare Matter of Flannelly v. Board of Trustees of N.Y. City Police Pension Fund, 278 A.D.2d 113, 718 N.Y.S.2d 43 [1st Dept.2000] ).


Summaries of

Heinichen v. Kelly

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
May 6, 2014
117 A.D.3d 441 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
Case details for

Heinichen v. Kelly

Case Details

Full title:In re Raymond HEINICHEN, Petitioner–Appellant, v. Raymond W. KELLY, etc…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: May 6, 2014

Citations

117 A.D.3d 441 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
117 A.D.3d 441
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 3203