From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Heine v. Russell

Supreme Court of Washington.
Apr 7, 2021
197 Wash. 2d 1005 (Wash. 2021)

Opinion

No. 99331-9

04-07-2021

Ralph A. HEINE, Petitioner, v. Tim S. RUSSELL, et al., Respondents.


ORDER

¶1 Department II of the Court, composed of Chief Justice González and Justices Madsen, Stephens, Yu, and Whitener (Justice Johnson sat for Justice Madsen), considered at its April 6, 2021, Motion Calendar whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b) and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.

¶2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶3 That the petition for review is denied and the Respondents' requests for attorney fees for filing an answer to the petition for review are granted. Respondents John Purdy and Tim and Roberta Russell are awarded reasonable attorney fees and expenses pursuant to RAP 18.1(j). The amount of the attorney fees and expenses will be determined by the Supreme Court Clerk pursuant to RAP 18.1. Pursuant to RAP 18.1(d), the Respondents should file an affidavit with the Clerk of the Washington State Supreme Court.

For the Court

/s/ González, C.J. CHIEF JUSTICE


Summaries of

Heine v. Russell

Supreme Court of Washington.
Apr 7, 2021
197 Wash. 2d 1005 (Wash. 2021)
Case details for

Heine v. Russell

Case Details

Full title:Ralph A. HEINE, Petitioner, v. Tim S. RUSSELL, et al., Respondents.

Court:Supreme Court of Washington.

Date published: Apr 7, 2021

Citations

197 Wash. 2d 1005 (Wash. 2021)
483 P.3d 778