From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Heim v. Tri-Lakes Ford Mercury, Inc.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 9, 2006
850 N.E.2d 26 (N.Y. 2006)

Opinion

255.

Submitted February 21, 2006.

Decided May 9, 2006.


Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that portion of the Appellate Division order that affirmed Supreme Court's order denying appellants' motion to renew, dismissed upon the ground that such portion of the order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.


Summaries of

Heim v. Tri-Lakes Ford Mercury, Inc.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 9, 2006
850 N.E.2d 26 (N.Y. 2006)
Case details for

Heim v. Tri-Lakes Ford Mercury, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:DAVID E. HEIM et al., Appellants, v. TRI-LAKES FORD MERCURY, INC., et al.…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: May 9, 2006

Citations

850 N.E.2d 26 (N.Y. 2006)
6 N.Y.3d 886
817 N.Y.S.2d 211