From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Heilman v. Valenzuela

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 2, 2015
CASE NO. CV 15-3256 JVS (FFM) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 2, 2015)

Opinion

CASE NO. CV 15-3256 JVS (FFM)

11-02-2015

THOMAS JOHN HEILMAN, Petitioner, v. E. VALENZUELA, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, all the records and files herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Petitioner has not filed any written Objections to the Report. The Court concurs with and accepts the findings, conclusions and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that (1) respondent's motion to dismiss is GRANTED; and (2) this action is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, without prejudice to Petitioner filing a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. DATED: November 2, 2015

/s/_________

JAMES V. SELNA

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Heilman v. Valenzuela

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 2, 2015
CASE NO. CV 15-3256 JVS (FFM) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 2, 2015)
Case details for

Heilman v. Valenzuela

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS JOHN HEILMAN, Petitioner, v. E. VALENZUELA, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Nov 2, 2015

Citations

CASE NO. CV 15-3256 JVS (FFM) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 2, 2015)