Opinion
May, 1936.
Present — Martin, P.J., Townley, Untermyer, Dore and Cohn, JJ.
Order denying plaintiff's motion for summary judgment unanimously affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Heermance v. Scocozza
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 1, 1936
248 App. Div. 572 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)
Summaries of
Heermance v. Scocozza
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 1, 1936
248 App. Div. 572 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)
Case details for
Heermance v. Scocozza
Case Details
Full title:CLAYTON J. HEERMANCE, Appellant, v. DANIEL SCOCOZZA, Respondent
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Date published: May 1, 1936
Citations
248 App. Div. 572 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)